Wednesday, February 28, 2007

The talk on the Internet & where it all started

On the 11th of September the BBC reported that WTC7 collapsed before it had. Who told the BBC that this building had collapsed before it did? How did that source know it was going to collapse?



"It seems this was not a result of a new attack, it was because the building had been weakened during this morning's attacks." - BBC World News studio anchorman, talking about the collapse of WTC7 at approx. 17:10 on 09/11/2001 - approx 10 minutes BEFORE the actual collapse of WTC7.

How could that conclusion have been reached before the building ACTUALLY COLLAPSED?!






Go and ask BBC about the source of information here

If you have problmes viewing the above BBC newsclip, then you can try here.

Hanging the womb of Iraq

Stop the executions!

Statement of Hana Albayaty, Ian Douglas, Abdul Ilah Albayaty, Iman Saadoon, Dirk Adriaensens and Ayse Berktay (14 Feb 2006)

[Français] - [Arabic] - [Spanish] - [Turkish] - Click here for list of endorsers.

We hope all endorse, distribute widely, organize and act. Please reply to hanaalbayaty@gmail.com

* Take Action ! Now ! Click here to read what you can do.

* Selected statements against the imminent execution of 3 Iraqi women.

Wassan Talib, 31 years old, Zainab Fadhil, 25 years old, and Liqa Omar Muhammad, 26 years old, face imminent execution in Iraq, all charged with “offences against the public welfare” by a government that cannot even provide electricity but fills the streets with dead bodies. All are in Baghdad’s Al-Kadhimiya Prison. Two have small children beside them. The 1-year-old daughter of Liqa was born in prison. All women deny the charges for which they face hanging.

We hope all endorse, distribute widely, organize and act. Please reply to hanaalbayaty@gmail.com

To read more go to The Brussels Tribunal

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Conflict Transformation by Peaceful Means

During the years there have been a lot of alternative peaceful solutions suggested for solving the crises in Iraq. So here again I list some suggestions, these are practical things that can be done.

  • The centre of it all resides in shifting from military solutions to political and humanitarian solutions.

  • U.S and its allies must admit that military attacks have only resulted in more violence, death, hate and destructions and not peace.

  • U.S gives Iraqis a timetable for leaving Iraq within 365 days. This is what the majority of Iraqis have been asking for years and nowadays it’s even what the majority of what people in the U.S. want too.

  • Until then any forigen troops are under the United Nations General Assembly rule, they represent the UN.

  • Start a Truth and Reconciliation Commission, get help from South Africa in this issue.

  • New democratic elections in 12 months.


  • Iraqis rule Iraq

  • Iraqis are offered the jobs in their country. Stop importing workforces from aboard when million of Iraqis are unemployed and all they want is to work.

  • Political militias are forbidden.

  • Foreign militias/mercenaries/private armies must leave Iraq immediately.

  • The real Iraqi resistance must stop its military attacks on occupation troops and its allies.

  • Put together the original Iraqi army. It will work as a good control mechanism on the streets in Iraq. This army is the one that protected Iraq in the war against Iran. This will increase the chance to more people working together with them. This will increase the stability in the Iraq cities and clarify who still does not understand that violence against Iraqis is unacceptable.

  • Under UNs Compensation Commission the US and its allies become liable under international law to pay compensation for losses and damages resulting from U.S invasion and occupation of Iraq.

  • Foreign troops must be accountable under Iraqi law. The immunity that Bremer gave them is not active any longer.

  • Iraq becomes a member of the ICC

  • All contracts and laws that have come up since the invasion must be stopped; it will be the next government to in full transparency to review them.

  • All “foreign advisers” that have been appointed by the occupation are to leave Iraq immediately.

  • All U.S. and other foreign military bases that have been built shall all be closed in 365 days. Thereafter it shall be open for Iraqis to move into. Iraqis who lost their home in this war.

  • Parties must be based on political ideologies. Not race, not religion, not which foreign country that supports you.

  • The current parties that have had political or economical support from a foreign country are allowed to participate in the elections coming up in 8-12 years. This will allow “free parties” to develop and “non free parties” to come back clean!

  • Since the elections are in 12 months, then the first 6 months are for parties to formulate their political programs. Then we have 5 months for these political programs to be available to the Iraqi people and let the debate start! Month 12 there is election.

  • Independent election monitors from the UN or even better from Amnesty International.

  • Starting up peaceful dialogues with neighbouring countries to work on the longer perspective for peace in the area.

  • Opening Amnesty International offices in every city and village in Iraq. Opening offices for well established international peace organisations in every city in Iraq. Letting these hold seminars, training sessions, and workshops on topics of human rights, solving conflicts thru non violence and working on the empowerment of civil society groups that are found in Iraq and establish more.

Also start a campaign of having these seminars and training sessions in all political parties, parliament, army units, new Iraqi police stations, Iraqi schools and work places too!

  • Starting an anti corruption campaign, here I believe Finland can lend a helping hand.

  • Starting democracy and human rights courses on TV, radio, newspapers and Internet. Here I suggest Switzerland to be the country to lend a hand!

All this can be accomplished and these suggestions work from grass root levels and up and that is what is needed if we want any country to succeed! Its clear from the last years military actions that change is needed, these suggestions are some steps towards that, they can develop and become even better too. We have to start somewhere...


For the whole world here are suggestions too:

  • People starts seriously using alternatives to oil. No more repression, domination and wars for oil or gas.
  • People starts seriously using sustainable methods when using water recourses. Let’s learn from half a centry disastrous oil conflicts and avoid future wars for water.
  • Air pollution, water shortage, water pollution and loss of biodiversity are all global problems. By changes in our daily behaviour we can save our planet. Becoming a vegan or vegetarian is a good step too.
  • Demand that Israel's and the Palestinian's state leagal borders are the ones from 1948. Both have to respect this.

  • Why not close down all U.S. military bases in the world! Let the money that has gone to the military and Pentagon instead go to U.S people's universal health care, better schools for U.S kids, getting rid of AIPAC and investing in a national and global education on solving conflicts by peacefull means instead! Does anyone have a current list/map of U.S. military bases in the world?
  • Join the disarment groups. The weapon industry’s only function is to produce products whose only purpose is to kill other human beings. Join disarment groups to get rid of the weapon industry.

Other suggestions are welcomed. So are your views how to improve/change the ones I have written with arguments.


Other solutions from Blogger Diablo can be read here (a must read)!



Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Baghdad Burning update about The Rape of Sabrine...


The Rape of Sabrine...
It takes a lot to get the energy and resolution to blog lately. I guess it’s mainly because just thinking about the state of Iraq leaves me drained and depressed. But I had to write tonight.

As I write this, Oprah is on Channel 4 (one of the MBC channels we get on Nilesat), showing Americans how to get out of debt. Her guest speaker is telling a studio full of American women who seem to have over-shopped that they could probably do with fewer designer products. As they talk about increasing incomes and fortunes, Sabrine Al-Janabi, a young Iraqi woman, is on Al Jazeera telling how Iraqi security forces abducted her from her home and raped her. You can only see her eyes, her voice is hoarse and it keeps breaking as she speaks. In the end she tells the reporter that she can’t talk about it anymore and she covers her eyes with shame.

Please read more here


: (

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Torture experience in the Abu Ghraib prison

STATUTORY DECLARATION


I, Ali Sh. Abbas (alias Ali Shalal) of full age and an Iraqi citizen do hereby solemnly and sincerely declare as follows:

1. I am 45 years old.

2. I now live in Amman, Jordan.

3. I was an Islamic education lecturer in the city of Al-Aladamiya, Iraq

4. The purpose of making this statutory declaration is to put on record my torture experience in the Abu Ghraib prison.

5. On the 13th October, 2003 while I was going to prayer in the mosque in Al-Amraya, Baghdad, the American troops arrested me. They tied my hands to the back of my body and put a bag over my head. They took me to a small prison in a U.S. military camp in Al-Amraya.

6. The Commander of this military camp, one Captain Philips told me that he had received an order from his superior to arrest me and he did not know the reasons for my arrest. I was left alone in the prison.

7. After two days, they transferred me to the Abu Ghraib prison. The first thing they did to me was to make a physical examination of my body and abused me. Together with other detainees, we were made to sit on the floor and were dragged to the interrogation room. This so called room is in fact a toilet (approximately 2m by 2m) and was flooded with water and human waste up to my heel level. I was asked to sit in the filthy water while the American interrogator stood outside the door, with the translator.

8. After the interrogation, I would be removed from the toilet, and before the next detainee is put into the toilet, the guards would urinate into the filthy water in front of the other detainees.

9. The first question they asked me was, “Are you a Sunni or Shiia?” I answered that this is the first time I have been asked this question in my life. I was surprised by this question, as in Iraq there is no such distinction or difference. The American interrogator replied that I must answer directly the questions and not to reply outside the question. He then said that in Iraq there are Sunnis, Shiias and Kurds.

10. The interrogators wore civilian clothes and the translator, an Afro-American wore American army uniform.

11. When I answered that I am an Iraqi Muslim, the interrogator refused to accept my answer and charged me for the following offence:

(a) That I am anti-Zionist and anti-Semitic.
(b) I supported the resistance
(c) I instigated the people to oppose the occupation
(d) That I knew the location of Osama bin Ladin

I protested and said that Muslims and Jews descended from the same historical family. I said that I could not be in the resistance because I am a disabled person and have an injured hand.

12. The interrogator accused me that I had injured my hand while attacking the American soldiers.

13. The interrogator informed me that they knew that I was an important person in the community and therefore could help them. As an inducement for my cooperation, the interrogator offered medical help for my injured hand.

14. When I did not cooperate, the interrogator asked me whether I considered the American army as “liberator” or “occupier”. When I replied that they were occupiers, he lost his temper and threatened me. He told me that I would be sent to Guantanamo Bay where even animals would not be able to survive.

15. They took me to another room and took record of my thumb print, a photo of my eye and a sample of my saliva for DNA analysis. After this procedure, they tagged me by putting a band round my wrist with the following particulars: my name, a number, my religious status and whether I had previous arrest.

16. They then beat me repeatedly and put me in a truck to transfer me to another part of the Abu Ghraib prison.

17. This part of the prison, was in an open space and consisted of five sectors, surrounded by walls and barb wires and was called “Fiji Land”. Each sector had five tents and surrounded by barb wires. When I was removed from the truck, the soldiers marked my forehead with the words “Big Fish” in red. All the detainees in this camp are considered “Big Fish”. I was located in camp “B”.


18. The living conditions in the camp were very bad. Each tent would have 45 to 50 detainees and the space for each detainee measured only 30cm by 30cm. We had to wait for 2 to 3 hours just to go to the toilets. There was very little water. Each tent was given only 60 litres of water daily to be shared by the detainees. This water was used for drinking and washing and cleaning the wounds after the torture sessions. They would also make us to stand for long hours.

19. Sometimes, as a punishment, no food is given to us. When food is given, breakfast is at 5.00 am, lunch is at 8.00 am and dinner at 1.00 pm. During Ramadhan, they bring food twice daily, first at 12.00 midnight and the second is given during fasting time to make the detainees break the religious duty of fasting.

20. During my captivity in the camp, I was interrogated and tortured twice. Each time I was threatened that I would be sent to Guantanamo Bay prison. During this period, I heard from my fellow detainees that they were tortured by cigarette burns, injected with hallucinating chemicals and had their rectum inserted with various types of instruments, such as wooden sticks and pipes. They would return to the camp, bleeding profusely. Some had their bones broken.

21. In my camp, I saw detainees brought over from a secret prison which I came to know later as being housed in the “Arabian Oil Institute” building, situated in the north of Baghdad. These detainees were badly injured.

22. After one month and just before sunset my number was called and they put a bag over my head and my hands were tied behind my back. My legs were also tied. They then transferred me to a cell.

23. When I was brought to the cell, they asked me in Arabic to strip but when I refused, they tore my clothes and tied me up again. They then dragged me up a flight of stairs and when I could not move, they beat me repeatedly. When I reached the top of the stairs, they tied me to some steel bars. They then threw at me human waste and urinated on me.

24. Next, they put a gun to my head and said that they would execute me there. Another soldier would use a megaphone to shout at me using abusive words and to humiliate me. During this time, I could hear the screams of other detainees being tortured. This went on till the next morning.

25. In the morning, an Israeli stood in front of me and took the bag from my head and told me in Arabic that he was an Israeli had interrogated and tortured detainees in Palestine. He told me that when detainees would not cooperate, they would be killed. He asked me repeatedly for names of resistance fighters. I told him that I do not know any resistance fighters but he would not believe me, and continued to beat me.

26. This Israeli dressed in civilian clothes tortured me by inserting in turn first with a jagged wooden stick into my rectum and then with the barrel of a rifle. I was cut inside and bled profusely. During this time, when any guard walked past me, they would beat me. I had no food for 36 hours.

27. The next morning, the Israeli interrogator came to my cell and tied me to the grill of the cell and he then played the pop song, “By the Rivers of Babylon” by Pop Group Boney M, continuously until the next morning. The effect on me was that I lost my hearing, and I lost my mind. It was very painful and I lost consciousness. I only woke up when the Israeli guard poured water on my head and face. When I regain consciousness, he started beating me again and demanded that I tell him of the names of resistance fighters and what activities that I did against the American soldiers. When I told him that I did not know any resistance fighters, he kicked me many times.

28. I was kept in the cell without clothes for two weeks. During this time, an American guard by the name of “Grainer” accompanied by a Moroccan Jew called Idel Palm ( also known as Abu Hamid) came to my cell and asked me about my bandaged hand which was injured before I was arrested. I told him that I had an operation. He then pulled the bandage which stained with blood from my hand and in doing so, tore the skin and flesh from my hands. I was in great pain and when I asked him for some pain killers, he stepped on my hands and said “this is American pain killer” and laughed at me.

29. On the 15th day of detention, I was given a blanket. I was relieved that some comfort was given to me. As I had no clothes, I made a hole in the centre of the blanket by rubbing the blanket against the wall, and I was able to cover my body. This is how all the prisoners cover their bodies when they were given a blanket.

30. One day, a prisoner walked past my cell and told me that the interrogators want to speed up their investigation and would use more brutal methods of torture to get answers that they want from the prisoners. I was brought to the investigation room, after they put a bag over my head. When I entered the investigation room, they remove the bag from my head to let me see the electrical wires which was attached to an electrical wall socket.

31. Present in the room was the Moroccan Jew, Idel Palm, the Israeli interrogator, two Americans one known as “Davies” and the other “Federick” and two others. They all wore civilian clothes, except the Americans who wore army uniforms. Idel Palm told me in Arabic that unless I cooperated, this would be my last chance to stay alive. I told him that I do not know anything about the resistance. The bag was then placed over my head again, and left alone for a long time. During this time, I heard several screams and cries from detainees who were being tortured.

32. The interrogators returned and forcefully placed me on top of a carton box containing can food. They then connected the wires to my fingers and ordered me to stretch my hand out horizontally, and switched on the electric power. As the electric current entered my whole body, I felt as if my eyes were being forced out and sparks flying out. My teeth were clattering violently and my legs shaking violently as well. My whole body was shaking all over.

33. I was electrocuted on three separate sessions. On the first two sessions, I was electrocuted twice, each time lasting few minutes. On the last session, as I was being electrocuted, I accidentally bit my tongue and was bleeding from the mouth. They stop the electrocution and a doctor was called to attend to me. I was lying down on the floor. The doctor poured some water into my mouth and used his feet to force open my mouth. He then remarked, “There is nothing serious, continue!” Then he left the room. However, the guard stopped the electrocution as I was bleeding profusely from my mouth and blood was all over my blanket and body. But they continued to beat me. After some time, they stopped beating me and took me back to my cell.

34. Throughout the time of my torture, the interrogators would take photographs.

35. I was then left alone in my cell for 49 days. During this period of detention, they stopped torturing me. At the end of the 49th day, I was transferred back to the camp, in tent C and remained there for another 45 days. I was informed by a prisoner that he over heard some guards saying that I was wrongly arrested and that I would be released.

36. I was released in the beginning of March 2004. I was put into a truck and taken to a highway and then thrown out. A passing car stopped and took me home.

37. As a result of this experience, I decided to establish an association to assist all torture victims, with the help of twelve other tortured victims.

38. I feel very sad that I have to remember and relive this horrible experience again and again, and I hope that the people will answer our call for help. God willing.

And I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same to be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1960.

Friday, February 16, 2007

Iraqi refugees

COALITION TO STOP DEPORTATIONS TO IRAQ
PRESS RELEASE Feb 14 2007

Some reports have at last been received about the fate of the asylum seekers forcibly removed to Iraq on February 12 from RAF Brize Norton.
Read more here


Iraqi passports not accepted as documents for travel
2007-02-16
The Swedish Migration Board decided today on a change in the Board’s regulations regarding Iraqi passports. This means that the Board will not accept S series passports as travel documents, as their quality has shown not to be good enough.
Read more here


U.N. Urges EU to Protect Iraqi Refugees
As the bloodshed in Iraq has increased, European governments have come under increasing pressure to open their doors to asylum-seekers. Many are worried that an escalation in violence in 2007 could generate a fresh wave of refugees.

So far, Sweden has received the largest number of fleeing Iraqis, followed by the Netherlands, Germany, Greece, Britain and Belgium.

The U.N. appeal came as the EU announced it would contribute $13 million more for Iraqi refugees. About 60 percent will go to help those who have fled to Syria, Jordan and Lebanon.

"Focusing on the most vulnerable groups, the aid would consist of basic health care and education as well as targeted distributions of food and essential household items," said the statement.

About 2 million Iraqis have fled the country and an additional 1.8 million are believed to be displaced inside Iraq. The refugee flow increased sharply as sectarian violence intensified over the past year.

UNHCR statistics show that 20,000 Iraqi applied for asylum in the EU last year, but Garlick said fewer than 10 percent of the applications were accepted.

Swedish Migration Minister Tobias Billstrom, speaking at a meeting of EU justice and interior ministers, appealed for greater burden-sharing among nations hosting Iraqi refugees.

More than 9,000 Iraqis were admitted to Sweden last year, and 25,000 are expected to claim asylum this year.

EU Justice and Home Affairs Commissioner Franco Frattini said the large numbers of claimants was "a particular problem now for Sweden. But I don't exclude that in the future it will become a problem for other member states."
Read more here


More Iraqi refugee news here



Sunday, February 11, 2007

الفرات : هلو دجله شلونج

This is a discussion between the rivers Tigris and Euphrates. They have a long discussion and one of the things Tigris tells Euphrates is that she is fed up and ready to leave Iraq to the Amazon.

It’s all in Arabic, so my English readers forgive me.

الفرات : هلو دجله شلونج

- دجله : انزول، استحي ولك، والله اني من الضوجه يمكن راح اطلع من العراق، راح اروح الى الامزون

شلش العراق


Saturday, February 10, 2007

Baghdad, Iraq, Iraqis, friends and family are in my thougts









Monday, February 05, 2007

Genocide in Vietnam is redone in Iraq

Iraq: The Genocide Option
By Edward Herman

It was claimed early in 2005 that the United States was considering resort to what has been called the "Salvadoran Option" in Iraq, in which, as had been done in El Salvador in the 1980s, U.S. Special Forces would train paramilitary squads to hunt down and assassinate rebel leaders and their supporters. [1] A year earlier, it was reported that a sizable fund had been appropriated for the creation of an exile-based paramilitary unit for Iraq, and that the money would more broadly "support U.S. efforts to create a lethal, and revengeful Iraqi security force." It was expected that this would lead to "a wave of extrajudicial killings" of armed rebels, but also of "nationalists, other opponents of the U.S. occupation and thousands of civilian Baathists." [2]

The rise of the death rate in Iraq, and the evidence of large-scale assassinations and slaughters frequently carried out by uniformed men, suggests that the Salvadoran option was put in place and that it has done its work well even if failing to bring victory to the Shiite leaders and militias and their sponsors.

However, along with the Salvadoran option the U.S. military had also stepped up its own activities in one of a series of "surges," among them the assault on Fallujah in November 2004, and using the Fallujah model, with the application of massive firepower in Sunni-dominated areas, much of it from the air, moving from town to town, in an effort to kill Sunni resistance fighters and render their home bases unusable. Because of the lavish use of firepower and limited concern with Iraqi civilian casualties, this process is very costly to civilians in the area of attack. Civilians also suffer from the fact that the invading troops not only don't speak their language, but become extra hostile as they suffer casualties from a resistance that lives among the local population. This results in greater ruthlessness and increasing numbers of cases of literal direct mass murder as in Haditha. [3]

This is reminiscent of U.S. policy during the Vietnam war, where torture and multiple Haditha-type massacres, enormous firepower, napalm, B-52 bombing raids, and chemical warfare applied to jungles and peasant farms, ravaged the country, leaving much of it a wasteland, killing several million civilians, and leaving a heritage of traumatized, injured and chemically damaged people as well.

It is important to understand that the most violent warfare, including My Lai and its many many look-alikes, as well as the use of napalm and dioxin-based herbicides, was applied in the southern part of the country, which the United States was allegedly "protecting" from an invasion from the north. The methods of warfare themselves demonstrated that the alleged protection and "saving" was a lie, but it should be recognized that the reason these horrors could be applied more lavishly in the south rather than the north is that the south was controlled by the U.S. occupation and its puppet government, so that, unlike North Vietnam, the terrible violence wrought against the southern peasantry could be relatively hidden and kept from public and international scrutiny.

The U.S. attack on Vietnam may be termed the "Genocide Option," as the killing and destruction went far beyond anything that took place in El Salvador, and threatened the survival of the southern population. Southern Vietnam had its U.S.-organized death squads, with Operation Phoenix famously accounting for possibly 40,000 assassinations of NLF cadres and unknown other victims of this murder program.

El Salvador also had impressive death squads, but couldn't match the scope and intensity of the violence wrought by the United States on the distant peasant society, which brought into play all weapons in the U.S. high-tech arsenal short of the nuclear-many being tested against live experimental victims--used in enormous volume, without moral restraint (and with minimal protest from the "international community").

By 1967 the level of violence had reached a point where Vietnam scholar Bernard Fall warned that "Vietnam as a cultural and historic entity…is threatened with extinction..[as]…the countryside literally dies under the blows of the largest military machine ever unleashed on an area of this size." [4] In the south, 9,000 out of 15,000 hamlets were damaged or destroyed, along with some 25 million acres of farmland and 12 million acres of forests. One and a half million cattle were killed, and the war left a million widows and 800,000 orphans. The chemical defoliation operations were vast and their effects could take many generations to reverse, and they resulted in a further generation of malformed children (500,000 in one 1997 estimate). [5]

This was a truly genocidal attack, both in volume and threat to viability and with its demand that the resistance surrender as the condition for termination of the assault. (In a marvel of transference, the oft-expressed U.S. position was that the refusal to surrender demonstrated a low Vietnamese valuation of Vietnamese life! In a further marvel of Western impudence, the Krstic decision by the NATO-organized Yugoslavia tribunal found that "genocide" had been committed by a NATO target group [Bosnian Serbs] because killings--which explicitly spared women and children--might have ended the viability of a single small town in Bosnia.)

Another feature of the Vietnam War of relevance today is that all through its murderous course it was argued in the United States that it must go on in order to avoid a post-occupation "bloodbath"! The huge ongoing and genocidal bloodbath was needed to prevent a hypothetical one that never did materialize. [6]

The genocide option threatens Iraq, where the United States is engaged in direct military action against another virtually defenceless population-in contrast with El Salvador where proxies did the dirty work. Military technology has advanced further, and the complete amorality of the Deciders and their willingness to kill without limit to achieve their goals or save face is clear. It is important for the Deciders that not too many U.S. service personnel be killed, as this has a definite negative effect on the national willingness to move forward to "victory" (or at least temporarily fending off acknowledging defeat). If U.S. casualties can be reduced by more intensive firepower, at the expense of greater Iraqi civilian casualties, that has been and will continue to be the route taken. Furthermore, U.S. pacification violence applied to Sunni-dominated towns is implemented out of sight of the mainstream media (although not completely hidden given the bravery of some non-imbedded Western journalists and Al Jazeera).

The Bush "surge" is a desperation maneuver, and in a context of ever-stronger political objections to more U.S. personnel in Iraq and sensitivity to U.S. casualties, there is good reason to believe that the Bush answer will be even more intensive firepower in Baghdad and other cities and villages in which the insurgents mingle easily with the civilian population. Bush even warns U.S. citizens of more blood and gore "even if our new strategy works exactly as planned." Furthermore, partly via the use of the Salvadoran Option and partly by U.S. manipulation of sectarian conflict, [7] the invasion-occupation has produced a deadly civil war in which the Sunnis and Shiites engage in large-scale communal ethnic cleansing and killing, adding to the toll.

There can be little doubt that the rate of civilian killing in Iraq is about to rise from something like the recent Lancet estimate of 655,000 to a larger figure. If "genocide" was committed in Bosnia, where recent establishment analysts concluded--embarrassingly, given the earlier institutionalized total of 250,000-- that approximately 100,000 people died on all sides, including military personnel, [8] surely we have a case of genocide in Iraq just during the period 2003-2006. And Bush is about to give us more, with the Democrats and UN looking on but doing nothing to restrain the killing machine.

Wouldn't it be nice if democracy worked and a popular antiwar vote had some effect?

And if the global double standard now in force was not so gross and the perpetrators responsible for this genocidal outburst could be brought before a real tribunal in the interest of real global justice before their next surge?

Friday, February 02, 2007

Bush: 'We're fighting for our way of life'

I have just returned from a vist at our Iraqi blogger 24 Steps to Liberty. Do visit him. I am so sad at the reality in Iraq today.

I have relatives who are stuck in Iraq. Some of them are waiting for visa to go to Egypt and they have been waiting for many months. My relative is a doctor and he has not been out of the house for over 3 months now, the militias are the reason. Its not that only Iraqis are under threat of attacks and getting killed from left and right its also that we have specific forces that target doctors and other well educated Iraqis. These doctors whose only wish is to help Iraqis, ease their pain and save their lives – those who kill these doctors want all Iraqis dead and not having the chance to be saved.

Honestly all this talk about attacking Iran these days makes me wonder what the hell is really going on. I mean in Iraq the USA is working hand in hand with the people that have all along been supported by the regime in Iran, so how can they be against Iran??!!

I know there are fanatics in the Iranian regime that want parts of Iraq in the same way there are fanatic in Israel that wants Iraq broken up for their own security reasons - they have the same goals. We know the US governments are extremely pro Israel so they in their turn would want what’s best for Israel and that is a broken Iraq. What we see in Iraq today is a broken and weakened country. So what ever these forces from outside might have for problems with each other they all seem to agree that a broken up Iraq is best for them.

It has been very cleverly thought out all this madness in Iraq. The only way any person/people could succeed in such a project Bush and his allies came up with, is to right away start terrorizing ordinary Iraqis. That way the masses could be controlled to NOT to go out in millions and kick the green zonians and occupation troops out. Or that educated Iraqis get a chance to give ordinary Iraqis an alternative to the green zonians and the occupation . Saddam did it by mokhabarat (secret police) and that could not be used so the terror technique was the way. I am serious, with all this madness we see in Iraq I get more and more convinced it is part of the plan to totally devastate it so that they can do what ever they want with it in the end. I know many people don’t like to bring up Israel but the fact is within their own ministry they had a policy that said that the Iraqi Iranian war was good because it would weaken Iraq to “finally” be broken into 3 parts. Well finally is here after the US illegal invasion and 13 years of genocide embargo. The fanatical people with power in neighbouring counties are reaching their goals.

The fact is the US is the super power in the world and a peaceful well developed united and truly free Iraq is not what their government wants. Because if that was what they had wanted well then they would not have started this war the way they did. They would not lie and deceive the way they do, they would not have managed this war the way they do, they would not have allied themselves with lying corrupted racist people, they would not still have close relations with dictators all over the world, they would not have disregarded ordinary Iraqis telling them over and over again to leave or at least give a timetable for leaving, they would not have tortured Iraqis, they would not have used DU weapons, they would not have volunteered to make Iraq the arena for war on terror, they would not have said we want to save American lives so lets have the war in Iraq instead and by it letting Iraqis die. Iraq is today exactly where Bush and the real team behind him wanted it to be.

Controlling the oil to protect the way of life in the west and fulfilling the wishes of some few powerful fanatical Zionists is what have mattered the last 60 years and still does.

To make the above possible these people in the US governments and allies elsewhere have made and illegal brutal Israeli occupation of Palestine for 40 years possible and they have given their full support to dictators in the region for 60 years so what we see in Iraq today is nothing to them – 4 years of some Arabs, Muslims, Iraqis living in hell and getting killed is nothing to them. The western way of life goes hand in hand with access to oil, Iraq has oil.


What was it Bush said in the interview with Rush Limbaugh when talking about Iraq last year?

If they control oil resources, then they pull oil off the market in order to run the price up, and they will do so unless we abandon Israel, for example, or unless we abandon allies.


What was it President Jimmy Carter said in the state of the union Address 23 of January 1980?


Jimmy Carter
State of the Union Address 1980
January 23, 1980
The crises in Iran and Afghanistan have dramatized a very important lesson: Our excessive dependence on foreign oil is a clear and present danger to our Nation's security.

…the overwhelming dependence of the Western democracies on oil supplies from the Middle East

Afghanistan is of great strategic importance: It contains more than two-thirds of the world's exportable oil.

…The Soviet Union is now attempting to consolidate a strategic position, therefore, that poses a grave threat to the free movement of Middle East oil.

…This situation demands careful thought, steady nerves, and resolute action, not only for this year but for many years to come. It demands collective efforts to meet this new threat to security in the Persian Gulf and in Southwest Asia. It demands the participation of all those who rely on oil from the Middle East.


And what did the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Africa Chairman Ed Royce (R-CA) say at the symposium African Oil: A Priority for U.S. National Security and African Development?

African oil should be treated as a priority for U.S. national security post 9-11


And what's with US military attacks in Somalia?

Could it be because of the World Bank coordinated geological study done in 1991 that found Somalia and Sudan to be on the top of the list of prospective commercial oil producers in the world.


OIL OIL OIL, GAS GAS GAS , RECOURSES RESOURSES RESOURSES its all wars and interventions for that.

If a couple of a hundreds of thousands Asians or Africans die here and there or live in poverty and without freedoms that is not the issue. The issue is that these western leaders and the big corporations that are behind them are becoming richer and saving their peoples way of life. All this is done with the help of corrupted regimes they themselves protect in Asia and Africa. Regimes that are oppressing millions of their own people for millions in a western bank and a handshake photo with a democratically elected western politician from time to time.


So what did Bush say?

'We're fighting for our way of life'

This means western access to oil, the Zionist lobby gets what ever it wants and that no freaking Asian or African tells us


but what about our way of life?